PolicyWTFs—A Hall of Shame
A compilation of all the failed policies that have received not-so-honourable mentions in this thoughtletter
This is our policyWTF Long List. Over four years of writing this thought-letter, we have compiled nearly a hundred boondoggles. We love despise each one of these policyWTFs, but the particularly egregious ones have been marked in bold. For your ease of reading, we’ve divided them into categories.
‘One Nation One X’ PolicyWTFs
Unease of Doing Business PolicyWTFs
The PolicyWTF that made India’s businesses uncompetitive — items reserved for manufacture exclusively by the small-scale sector
Mutually Assured Decline — The Downsides of Subsidizing Chipmakers
Tax and Public Finance PolicyWTFs
The Indefensibility of Defence Financing
BanWTF
Trade PolicyWTFs
Price and Quantity ControlWTFs
Public Administration WTFs
Social PolicyWTFs
China’s one-child policy (一孩政策) and its unintended consequences
Will Sons of Soil Do Tons of Toil? — Reservations for Locals
Tech PolicyWTFs
MiscellaneousWTFs
Confucianism or Confusionism? — the restrictions on Confucius Institutes
Global PolicyWTF—Turkey for Thanksgiving
Wait, there’s more. We don’t just criticise everything governments do. We also acknowledge policies that make us better off. Here’s our list.
Not(PolicyWTFs)—The Hall of Fame
Making Education Legitimately Profitable (somewhat)
Reforming Procurement (A Work in Progress)
P.S.: Of course, we have also discussed frameworks for identifying policy successes.
Thanks for listing the posts topic wise. Many times I started reading the posts from the beginning but it is difficult to complete 262 posts. This list would be helpful to select a topic of interest. Without doubt you are great public educators.
There is one advantage of One-Nation-One-Election. I wrote this in the OpenTakshashila. Reiterating that here : (please let me know if my point is not clear)
One advantage of ONOE is 'bitter pill digestion' time.
Let us assume there are some measures which are difficult for the public in the short term but deliver results within 4-5 years. Let us assume these measures are good for the nation in the long term, and hence are necessary. Let us call these measures bitter-pills for the sake of this discussion.
With a guarantee of 5 years in hand, a government can administer those bitter pills and still claim credit in the next election cycle because the good results will be visible by that time. If there are overlapping elections (Lok sabha/state) all the time, then the only way to administer those bitter pills will be for a political party to sacrifice its electoral interests in the intermediate elections. Putting such electoral/political costs on well-designed bitter-pills is counterproductive. The current state of election-always-cycle can be preventing many such beneficial bitter pills getting implemented ever.
ONOE can solve the bitter-pill-digestion-time problem.